Academic judgment, made visible.
Rocketproof runs AI-powered oral exams so faculty can verify that students actually understand their own work. Students submit, answer live questions, and get recorded — faculty review the transcript, score the rubric, and release feedback. No extra meetings. No guesswork.
Faculty? Start free as an instructor — no card required.
Student submits work
Paper, slides, reading, or scenario — uploaded before the session starts.
AI generates questions
Rocketproof reads the submission and builds a targeted question plan.
Faculty reviews session
Transcript, recording, and rubric score in one place. Release when ready.
No video to press play on, no imagination required. This is the shape of every session: a question generated from the student's own work, a spoken answer, and a rubric score faculty can stand behind.
Question 1 · generated from the student's own submission
Your methods section says you used a paired t-test. Why was that the right choice for this design?
Spoken response
Because every participant was measured twice — before and after the intervention — so the samples are dependent, not independent…
A walk-through of how oral defenses work end-to-end on the platform — from the question plan Rocketproof builds, through a recorded session, to the faculty review surface where the rubric gets scored.
Oral defenses are the gold standard for academic integrity. Rocketproof makes them scalable, giving faculty a structured review surface without adding hours of coordination overhead.
Every paper upload, presentation delivery, and reading response becomes a defensible evidence trail. Faculty review the record. Students know the standard. Institutions keep the rigor.
Submission-only grading and honor pledges can't show you what a student understands. A recorded, source-aware oral defense can.
| Capability | Rocketproof | Paper only | Honor pledge |
|---|---|---|---|
Evidence of actual understanding | |||
Structured faculty review surface | partial | ||
Recorded transcript + audio/video | |||
Source-aware questioning | |||
Defensible audit trail | |||
Integrity monitoring controls | |||
Rubric-aligned scoring | manual | ||
Scales to 200+ students | |||
Zero extra admin overhead |
Papers, decks, reading passages, and scenario prompts all shape the question path before the session starts.
A 40-page thesis generates 12 questions tied to its argument structure and cited sources — not a generic question bank.
Transcripts, delivery clips, identity checks, and environment scan artifacts stay organized inside one review surface.
Faculty open one panel and see a 14-minute recording, full transcript, identity check result, and rubric scores side by side.
Enable only what matters: ID checks, environment scans, prompt leakage review, and anomaly alerts.
Enable ID check and environment scan for high-stakes finals; skip them entirely for low-stakes reading checks.
Source summaries, strengths, weak spots, hesitation patterns, and rubric scoring all in one review panel.
The AI flags "student hesitated on methodology questions" with a follow-up prompt the instructor can use immediately.
Every workflow produces the same structured evidence trail, so faculty review stays consistent regardless of assignment type.
Student defends a written submission live via AI questioning tied to their own argument.
Student delivers a recorded presentation; AI questions the deck content and delivery.
Verifies direct comprehension of an assigned reading, chapter, or passage.
Probes theme, tone, symbolism, and textual evidence in literary works.
Student navigates branching decision scenarios, justifying choices at each branch.
Student defends and explains the feedback they gave on a peer's submitted work.
Student answers questions drawn from a missed class session transcript or recording.
Multi-phase oral defense for thesis or capstone milestones with cumulative rubric tracking.
Student reasons through a business, legal, or clinical case scenario in real time.
An individualized Socratic conversation grounded in an instructor-authored prompt and attached materials.
A unique final exam per student, synthesized from that student's own prior course work.
The fast version of the overview, focused on the core product flow: watch a paper turn into a question plan, a student answer it, and the faculty review surface when the session lands.
Two minutes, no signup required.
Students upload the paper. Rocketproof builds a targeted defense plan. Faculty review the source summary and Q&A record together.
Deck upload, delivery recording, transcript capture, and deck-aware Q&A all in a single workflow.
Reading assessment for direct comprehension. Literature mode for theme, tone, symbolism, and textual evidence.
Branching scenarios, peer review moderation, class makeups, and capstone checkpoints. All first-class workflows.
Choose the workflow, attach the source, set difficulty, configure checks.
Students upload, complete checks, and move into the live defense flow.
Questions, transcripts, recordings, and signals captured automatically.
Read the summary, inspect the transcript, confirm the rubric, release what you approve.
From the moment a faculty member creates an oral defense assignment to the moment they release feedback, Rocketproof carries the full evidence trail. Three real product views, in order, with no audio — a silent demo reel.
Instructors create an oral defense assignment, choose settings, select assignment types, and assign it to students.
Students receive the assignment, respond through the guided workflow, and submit their work for review.
Instructors review the student’s submission, transcript, AI-assisted analysis, and scoring support.
The questions your IT and compliance offices will ask — answered in plain language, not buried in a security PDF.
Student records are processed under your institution’s direction, consistent with FERPA. The full policy is public — no NDA required to read it.
Read the privacy policyDrops into Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, and D2L with grade passback (AGS) out of the box. No separate login for students.
Recordings, transcripts, and integrity artifacts are stored behind signed access links, scoped by your retention settings.
Extended-time multipliers, audio-only mode, and question pacing — configurable per student or course-wide.
No. The platform prepares the questioning plan and draft analysis, but faculty review, adjust, and decide what gets released.
Most oral defense sessions run 12–22 minutes depending on workflow type, question depth, and submission length. Faculty can configure session caps per assignment.
Recordings, transcripts, rubric scores, source summaries, and integrity artifacts. All stored behind signed access links per your settings.
Yes. Faculty can upload or recreate their rubric criteria inside Rocketproof. The platform maps rubric dimensions to session questions and scoring.
Only if the instructor enables low-bandwidth audio-only mode for that assignment. Video remains the default path.
Yes. Extended time multipliers, audio-only mode, and question pacing settings are all configurable per-student or course-wide through accommodations settings.
Rocketproof supports LTI 1.3 and grade passback (AGS) for Canvas, Blackboard, and other compliant LMS platforms.
Yes. Reading Assessment and Literature Analysis are separate workflows with configurable depth.
Sessions are recoverable. Students can resume from the last completed question within the session window. All captured data before disconnection is preserved.
Instructors are always free. Student seats are priced per semester pass. Department and institution licenses include volume discounts and centralized billing.
Join the waitlist for early access, start with a free instructor account, or request a department quote if you want students covered from day one.
