For law and criminal justice

A brief shows what a student argues. Questioning shows whether they can defend it.

Students read cases about examinations they rarely get to conduct. A clinic or moot court gives each student a few turns, and the instructor cannot watch every line of questioning. A written memo shows the research. It does not show how the student handles an answer they did not expect.

Try the interactive demo How simulations work

Two ways to use it

Simulate the situation. Assess the understanding.

The first example puts the student inside the situation. The second asks the student to explain and defend work they have produced. Both end in the same instructor review.

Simulate

Interview a hesitant witness

Assignment type: Role-Play Interview

The situation: A witness to a workplace incident remembers some details clearly, is unsure about others, and answers only the question asked.
The AI: A cautious witness with a defined account and a reason to hedge. Some details come out only when the student asks precise, well-formed questions.
The student’s task: Draw out the account with open questions, test one inconsistency, and summarize what the witness can and cannot support.

What you can assess

Form and precision of questions
Handling of an inconsistency
Accuracy of the final summary

Assess

Defend a memo or brief

Assignment type: Paper Defense

The situation: A student submits a legal memo or a brief.
The AI: The AI examiner questions the student as a judge or a senior attorney would, about the authorities and reasoning in the student’s own document.
The student’s task: Explain why each authority supports the argument and respond to the strongest counterargument.

What you can assess

Use of authority
Response to counterargument
Clarity of legal reasoning

These are examples of assignments an instructor could build. They are not customer case studies.

Build with AI

Start from a description, finish as the expert.

Describe the case file and the skill you want students to practice. The assignment assistant drafts the witness account and the facts that stay hidden, and you check them against the case file before any student sees the scenario.

Read more about the built-in AI agents and what they can and cannot do.

Rubric ideas

Criteria you might score against.

Asks clear, well-formed questions
Develops the key facts
Responds to an inconsistency
Reasons from authority

Every score is a draft with the evidence behind it. You review the transcript, adjust the scores and decide what is released. See how authentic assessment fits into a course.

Questions

Law and criminal justice questions, answered.

Can Rocketproof be used for law and criminal justice?

Yes. An instructor defines a witness, client or officer, including what that character knows and will reveal, and students interview them by voice or text. Students can also defend a submitted memo or brief under questioning. The transcript and rubric evidence go to the instructor for review. It supplements clinics and moot court and does not replace them.

Bring this into law and criminal justice.

Try the interactive demo, or request a pilot to build your first assignment.

Request a Pilot Try the interactive demo